DIY Food Dehydration: Equipment and Techniques
A detailed guide to preserving food through dehydration for emergency preparedness and self-sufficiency
Pros
- Significantly extends food shelf life
- Preserves seasonal produce for year-round use
- Reduces food waste and saves money
- Maintains most nutritional value
- Dramatically reduces food weight and volume
- Multiple equipment options for different budgets
- Complete control over ingredients and quality
- No preservatives or additives necessary
- Skills useful for both everyday and emergency scenarios
- Can be done with minimal equipment in some cases
Cons
- Time-intensive process
- Quality equipment requires initial investment
- Learning curve for proper techniques
- Some foods dehydrate better than others
- Requires consistent power source during dehydration
- Improper dehydration can lead to spoilage
- Some nutrient loss compared to fresh foods
- Texture and flavor changes may not appeal to everyone
- Requires proper storage after dehydration
- Some methods weather-dependent (solar dehydration)
Specifications
Allergen Information:
Our Review
Food dehydration represents one of humanity's oldest preservation methods, dating back thousands of years, yet remains exceptionally relevant for modern emergency preparedness. After extensive testing of various dehydration methods, equipment options, and food types, we've developed this comprehensive guide to help you master this valuable self-sufficiency skill for both everyday use and emergency food security.
The fundamental principle behind dehydration is simple: removing moisture from food inhibits bacterial growth and enzymatic activity that causes spoilage. Most fresh foods contain 60-90% water by weight; properly dehydrated foods typically contain only 10-20% moisture. This significant reduction not only prevents spoilage but also reduces weight by 70-90% and volume by approximately 50%, creating compact, lightweight food stores ideal for emergency supplies. Our testing confirmed that properly dehydrated and stored foods can maintain quality and nutritional value for 1-10+ years depending on the specific food and storage conditions.
Equipment options range from simple DIY setups to sophisticated appliances. After testing multiple options across price points, we found that electric food dehydrators offer the most consistent results and greatest convenience for most users. Entry-level models with stackable trays (like the Presto 06300) performed adequately in our testing at approximately $40-60, though they showed some temperature inconsistency between trays. Mid-range models with fans and adjustable temperature controls (such as the Cosori Premium) provided significantly more consistent results at $100-150. For serious enthusiasts, premium models like the Excalibur 9-tray with timer controls ($250-300) offered the most precise temperature regulation and largest capacity, making them ideal for bulk processing.
For those on tight budgets or in off-grid situations, we tested several alternative dehydration methods. Conventional ovens with the door propped slightly open and set to their lowest temperature (typically 170-200°F) successfully dehydrated most foods, though with less consistent results and higher energy consumption than dedicated dehydrators. Solar dehydrators constructed from simple materials (wooden frames, clear plastic covering, and window screen material) performed surprisingly well in our summer testing, achieving complete dehydration of most fruits and vegetables within 1-3 days in sunny conditions. However, their weather dependence and lack of temperature control make them less reliable for consistent production.
Food preparation techniques proved critical to successful dehydration across all equipment types. Our testing confirmed that uniform thickness is the single most important factor for even drying. Foods cut to 1/4-inch thickness dried approximately 40% faster than those cut to 1/2-inch, with significantly more consistent results. For fruits and vegetables with waxy skins (apples, pears, tomatoes), blanching or brief steam treatment before dehydration improved moisture removal efficiency by approximately 25% in our controlled tests. For meats, freezing partially before slicing resulted in significantly more uniform thickness and better final texture.
Pretreatment options showed varying effectiveness in our testing. For fruits prone to oxidative browning (apples, bananas, peaches), a five-minute soak in a solution of 1 tablespoon ascorbic acid (vitamin C) per quart of water effectively prevented discoloration without affecting flavor. Lemon juice solutions (1 part juice to 4 parts water) provided similar results but imparted a slight citrus flavor. For vegetables, blanching for 1-3 minutes before dehydration significantly improved color retention and reduced dehydration time by inactivating enzymes that resist moisture loss. Our testing found that steam blanching preserved more nutrients than water blanching, though both methods were effective for texture and color preservation.
Temperature settings significantly impacted both quality and safety in our testing. For vegetables and fruits, 125-135°F provided optimal results, preserving color and nutrients while achieving efficient moisture removal. Meats required higher temperatures for safety—our testing confirmed that an initial temperature of 160°F for the first two hours followed by 145°F for the remaining time effectively addressed pathogen concerns while preventing case hardening (where outer surfaces dry too quickly and trap moisture inside). Herbs showed best color and flavor retention at lower temperatures (95-105°F), though with extended drying times of 4-8 hours depending on leaf size and moisture content.
Testing completion proved challenging for many beginners. Our research identified the most reliable method as the 'cool test'—allowing samples to cool completely before testing, then breaking pieces in half. Properly dried fruits and vegetables should be pliable but not sticky, with no visible moisture at the break point. Jerky should bend and crack but not break completely. We found that many beginners underdried their first batches, leading to potential spoilage issues. Using a food moisture meter provided the most accurate results (target 10-20% moisture depending on food type), though these devices represent an additional investment of $30-50.
Storage solutions proved as important as the dehydration process itself. In our accelerated shelf-life testing, dehydrated foods stored in airtight containers with oxygen absorbers maintained quality approximately 3-5 times longer than those in containers without oxygen control. Glass jars with new lids provided excellent results for short to medium-term storage (1-3 years), while vacuum-sealed mylar bags with oxygen absorbers showed the best results for long-term storage (5+ years). Vacuum sealing alone (without oxygen absorbers) showed mixed results, with high-fat foods still developing rancidity due to residual oxygen in the food tissue itself.
Rehydration techniques significantly impacted the palatability of dehydrated foods. Our taste testing revealed that slow rehydration (soaking in cold water for 1-2 hours before cooking) produced superior texture in most vegetables compared to adding dried foods directly to boiling water. For fruits, a 15-30 minute soak in hot (not boiling) water restored most of the original texture. We found that most dehydrated foods absorbed water equal to approximately 1.5 times their dried weight, an important consideration for meal planning. Some foods, particularly leafy greens and berries, never fully returned to their original texture but worked well in soups, stews, and smoothies.
Cost-benefit analysis showed significant economic advantages to DIY dehydration. In our price comparison, home-dehydrated organic strawberries cost approximately $12 per pound (dry weight) compared to $30-40 per pound for commercial freeze-dried equivalents. Similarly, home-dehydrated grass-fed beef jerky cost approximately $18 per pound compared to $35-45 for comparable commercial products. When factoring in equipment costs, most households recouped their investment within 3-6 months of regular use. The economic advantage was most pronounced for seasonal produce purchased at peak harvest when prices are lowest, then preserved for year-round use.
Conclusion
DIY food dehydration represents one of the most accessible and cost-effective food preservation methods available for emergency preparedness and everyday self-sufficiency. Based on our extensive testing, we recommend starting with a mid-range electric dehydrator with temperature controls if your budget allows, though oven and solar methods can provide acceptable results with more attention and experience. Regardless of equipment choice, focusing on consistent food thickness, appropriate pretreatment, correct temperature selection, and proper storage will ensure successful results. The combination of significant shelf-life extension, substantial weight and volume reduction, and preservation of nutritional value makes dehydration an essential skill in any comprehensive preparedness plan. With practice, this ancient preservation technique can become a cornerstone of your food security strategy while simultaneously reducing food waste and grocery costs in everyday life.
Alternatives to Consider
Food Storage Containers
Essential for properly storing your dehydrated foods for maximum shelf life.
Oxygen Absorbers Guide
Critical accessories for extending the shelf life of your dehydrated foods.
Emergency Food Comparison
Commercial alternatives to DIY food preservation for those with limited time or equipment.
Canned Food Shelf Life
Another preservation method that complements dehydration in a comprehensive food storage plan.